The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurements of the growth of structure and expansion rate at z = 0.57 from anisotropic clustering

Publication information:

Reid B, Samushia L, White M, Percival W, Manera M, Padmanabhan N, Ross A, Sánchez A, Bailey S, Bizyaev D, et al. The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurements of the growth of structure and expansion rate at z = 0.57 from anisotropic clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2012;426:2719–2737.

Abstract

We analyse the anisotropic clustering of massive galaxies from the SloanDigital Sky Survey III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS)Data Release 9 (DR9) sample, which consists of 264 283 galaxies in theredshift range 0.43 z 0.7 spanning 3275 deg2. Bothpeculiar velocities and errors in the assumed redshift-distance relation('Alcock-Paczynski effect') generate correlations between clusteringamplitude and orientation with respect to the line of sight. Togetherwith the sharp baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) standard ruler, ourmeasurements of the broad-band shape of the monopole and quadrupolecorrelation functions simultaneously constrain the comoving angulardiameter distance (2190 ± 61 Mpc) to z = 0.57, the Hubbleexpansion rate at z = 0.57 (92.4 ± 4.5 km s-1Mpc-1) and the growth rate of structure at that same redshift(dσ8/d ln a = 0.43 ± 0.069). Our analysisprovides the best current direct determination of both DA andH in galaxy clustering data using this technique. If we further assume aΛcold dark matter expansion history, our growth constrainttightens to dσ8/d ln a = 0.415 ± 0.034. Incombination with the cosmic microwave background, our measurements ofDA, H and dσ8/d ln a all separately requiredark energy at z > 0.57, and when combined implyΩΛ = 0.74 ± 0.016, independent of theUniverse's evolution at z 0.57. All of these constraints assumescale-independent linear growth, and assume general relativity tocompute both O(10 per cent) non-linear model corrections and our errors.In our companion paper, Samushia et al., we explore further cosmologicalimplications of these observations.